<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C L A Y F O X &#187; most influential list</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clayfox.com/tag/most-influential-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clayfox.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time rendered moot</title>
		<link>http://www.clayfox.com/2009/04/28/time-rendered-moot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clayfox.com/2009/04/28/time-rendered-moot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Phillipson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[^]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic productivity utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captcha interpreter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[most influential list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clayfox.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you partial to absurd lists? So is Time Magazine! This bastion of old media has been developing a &#8220;World&#8217;s Most Influential&#8221; franchise over the past few years, addressing or cultivating some mysterious need to rank Vladimir Putin against Miley Cyrus on a fuzzy scale of &#8220;influence.&#8221; You can watch a Time editor fumble for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you partial to absurd lists?  So is Time Magazine!  This <a href="http://www.clayfox.com/2008/11/19/google-images-come-to-life/">bastion of old media</a> has been developing a &#8220;World&#8217;s Most Influential&#8221; franchise over the past few years, addressing or cultivating some mysterious need to rank Vladimir Putin against Miley Cyrus on a fuzzy scale of &#8220;influence.&#8221;  You can watch a Time editor <a href="http://www.time.com/time/video?bcpid=16424699001&#038;bctid=21029337001">fumble for a rationale for the whole enterprise</a>, but really why bother.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s list does pack a punch though, even if it makes a complete hash of Time&#8217;s list fetish.  Time threw the list open to online readers with a poll that got relentlessly, ingeniously hacked.  Despite Time&#8217;s best efforts, a person called &#8220;moot&#8221; ended up topping the poll as the world&#8217;s most influential person, heading a list that defined and maintained across days of voting a mysterious acrostic:  &#8220;Marblecake also the game.&#8221;  This phrase <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/4chan-takes-over-the-time-100/">means something</a> to tittering hackers clustered around a bulletin board called 4chan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clayfox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/marble-cake.jpg"><img src="http://www.clayfox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/marble-cake.jpg" alt="" title="marble-cake" width="500" height="508" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-228" /></a></p>
<p>Unable to run a real poll online, Time is now trying to <a href="http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1894028,00.html">laugh the whole thing off</a>:  &#8220;To put the magnitude of the upset in perspective, it&#8217;s worth noting that everyone moot beat out actually has a job.&#8221;  Be that as it may, it&#8217;s worth further noting that &#8220;everyone moot beat out&#8221; was deliberately positioned on the list by &#8220;moot,&#8221; who did a fine job, actually, of endangering the jobs of hapless Time employees.  </p>
<p>Of particular interest in this embarrassment is the testing of reCAPTCHA, the defense against spam comment submission once used by this website &#038; still in use all over the web, including at Time&#8217;s ill-fated poll.  The blog Music Machinery has been tracking Time&#8217;s losing struggle to shore up their poll against a flood of bogus submissions, and has a particularly <a href="http://musicmachinery.com/2009/04/27/moot-wins-time-inc-loses/">detailed rundown of hackers&#8217; manipulations of ReCAPTCHA</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clayfox.com/2007/06/20/trailing-comments">As I described a while ago</a>, reCAPTCHA provides two words for a person to recognize and type:  an image of a &#8216;control&#8217; word that been identified by consensus, along with another image of an &#8216;unknown&#8217; word.  It&#8217;s a clever way to check if a captcha interpreter is trustworthy and then apply her interpretation to an &#8216;unknown&#8217; word &#8212; and actually harness a comment/poll submission utility for text digitization projects.  </p>
<p>In this instance, according to Music Machinery, the hackers tried to distinguish the &#8216;control&#8217; word and match that, then flood reCAPTCHA with fake interpretations of the &#8216;unknown&#8217; word (every &#8216;unknown&#8217; word was interpreted as &#8216;penis,&#8217; heh heh), creating a bogus consensus around &#8216;unknown&#8217; words that would turn them into zombie &#8216;control&#8217; words.  An overwhelmed and standardized control, in turn, would facilitate autovoting.   </p>
<p>In the end, again according to the Music Machinery narrative, all this business of distinguishing control words in reCAPTCHAs was enough of a speed bump that the hackers resorted to &#8220;brute force&#8221;:  ie, interpreting both reCAPTCHA words and voting as frantically as they could by hand, with the help of some basic productivity utilities. This took a grimly dedicated team of devoted voters interpreting two reCAPTCHAs and casting votes over 200 times <del datetime="2009-04-29T15:53:31+00:00">per hour</del> <em>per minute</em>, for 40 or more hours while the poll was still open.  </p>
<p>So what are we left with?  Time embarrassed, reCAPTCHA tested, and a real contest, after all, for influence.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.clayfox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/marblecake.jpg"><img src="http://www.clayfox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/marblecake.jpg" alt="" title="marblecake" width="400" height="349" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-225" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clayfox.com/2009/04/28/time-rendered-moot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

