|
Keats and his Nightingale: Birds of
a Feather
One minute past, and Lethe-words had sunk:
'Tis not through envy of thy happy lot,
But being too happy in thine happiness
The above lines from Keats' 'Ode to a Nightingale' seem to claim
some loss of self of the poet in his subject. But despite this insistence,
the connection between the poet's world and the imagined world
of the nightingale is actually quite tenuous, and falters incessantly
through the poem before giving way completely. He is reaching for
something eternal and unshakeable, inspired by the song of the nightingale,
but ends up making a wayward claim to the immortality of the bird
itself. He seems to be attempting to contrast the lasting delight
of the nightingale's world with the dreary death and depression of
his own, but fails to realize that the two chirpers are, indeed,
birds of a feather.
Keats' nightingale exemplifies eternal beauty and
a constancy not native to his world where "Beauty cannot keep
her lustrous eyes." The world
in which the poet resides is the inconstant mortal world in which Death and
Despair loom above all and Death holds great appeal as the poet's only recourse
for escape. Even when he is drawn into the nightingale's "plaintive
anthem" he wishes only to die while hearing it. His 'love' of death
is made stronger by the beauty of the nightingale's song. It is this immortal,
infallible beauty in which the poet wants to lose himself, and in his ecstasy
(and envy) he claims: "Thou was not born for death, immortal bird! No
hungry generations tread thee down" (61-2). His insistence on the immortality
of the bird is a fantasy, and important because it signifies that he has
not fully grasped the significance of the nightingale's song. Yes, the bird's "voice
was heard in ancient days by emperor and clown" (63-4), but that is
not to say that it was the same bird who sung. Poets were also heard in ancient
times, and their song, too, can last indefinitely.
The point is that the nightingale
is no more immortal than the poet, and his song (and its effect) not all
that different from Keats' poetry. The
nightingale's
song is sung against the same mortal backdrop, the same inevitable, impending
fate, and the poet is overwhelmed by the beauty of it. Keats knows this
concept very well, as exemplified in his conclusion to 'Ode on a
Grecian Urn': "'Beauty
is truth, truth beauty'; that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to
know" (49-50). Against Death, only beauty is eternal and constant. Yet
here he has a difficult time getting through his own weighty despair and
feeling comfortable in this transcendent truth. Though he declares: "I
will fly to thee on the viewless wings of poesy," by the end of the
same stanza he has lapsed once again into his world where "there is
no light."
Matt Smaus
|